I would not call for support or ask for a refund, I said "I tried to be friends" with your software multiple times, but failed. I did not point out "a few minor aesthetic issues", I basically said that UI design has BASIC NON UNDERSTANDABLE ERRORS and VERY LITTLE IMPROVEMENT in years. You do point out a few minor aesthetic issues that we are already working on (along with support for dark mode), Since version 7, the user interface and its stability has been a tragedy.įor years I have tried to draw your attention to this with constructive contributions by E-Mail or here in the Form. So you are saying: «We can find no communication with our sales or support teams from you so you have no basis for your comment that we are not responsive.» You do point out a few minor aesthetic issues that we are already working on (along with support for dark mode), but frankly we find delivering new technologies like the recent TwinMotion/Unreal interface much more interesting and important to our users. Z daily for productive modeling so it is clearly not " appalling software " to them.Z free which only has a small percentage of the features found in form.You are also basing your comments on form Obviously you do not like some aesthetics of the software and you are entitled to your opinion. We can find no communication with our sales or support teams from you so you have no basis for your comment that we are not responsive. Thank you for taking the time to post, however we can only wonder what you motivations are. I'd forget about any new feature but instead do a complete redesign of the interface! To make a final point: things like that in the attached picture not only hurt my eyes: I can't work with such an attitude. Nevertheless, I'll still be watching and I'll definitely try Version 10 again. It could be faster than sketchup, more precise than cinema, easier than blender and at least as capable as rhino. And that many design errors, negligences and nuisances should have been eliminated 5, 10 or 20 years ago. If you think twinmotion and unreal connection are important: fine, but this market is cramped! z, and I can totally understand them!īut, and that is a big but, I do not feel that the software does evolve fast enough.Each time I admired the precision that can be achieved and the many tools offered (in comparison with other software at that time for that price).Īlso, I have no doubt that there are devoted followers of form 2010-12 in an another office and 10 years before that at university (where to my knowledge it is not used anymore). Of course I did try the full version: as trial in version 9, and in ca. I did not intend to claim that support would be slow or unresponsive, I would not suppose that (and also I did not ask any question or need support, so I can not say). If the plan would be to keep this software's profile low and still make money from it: just go on.Īttached are some random aspects of the interface, all small but in sum it is severely irritating that this should be non-beta 1.0 software, but instead celebrates 30th birthday 2021. I am serious: I could spend a day at AutoDeSys and bring that software into the 20th century. z is now a non appalling software in 2021 and this results in a small community and low interest from outside.It is also not enough to offer state of the art technology (like sub-D), the tools have to evolve! Some modern aspects of designing 3d like parametric, history- or node-based design (and a proper integrated renderer), which other software solutions have long used, are not covered here anyway! slow response to whishes from users (like many other companies, but most of them have a solid plug in/addon source) interface not customizable enough, even in the pro version (unlike c4d, even rhino!) non consistent tool options (unlike c4d) bad quality check of functions and tools (unlike rhino) bad icon design (unlike c4d for example) bad menu typograpy (touches edges, not aligned, not consistent) (see blender or archicad) My main concern lies in the dated and non consistent interface design I know, it is a small company, but some aspects have not been addressed for ages: z again, this time in version 9 (in the free version).It always seemed capable and even promising back then, but ended up being frustrating and tiresome. I even keep a sheep shaver emulation with Mac OS 8 and once in a while I go back this timemachine. As an architect, I have tried to use every modeling software there is, from really old stuff like Moray (1991), 3D Studio, Ray Dream designer onwards, via 3ds max, cinema, blender, rhino, sketchup, etc., also all kinds of caad software.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |